As feared, The Teranga Lions of Senegal find it hard to hold off Colombia in their Group H clash on Thursday and was consequently thumped out of the 2018 Mundial in Russia, affirming the end of every one of the five African representatives in the World Cup.
Senegal’s elimination on fair play rules not only made World Cup history, it is likewise the first awful time since 1982 that an African team failed to reach the knock-out stage.
Thirty-six years prior such an awful outing by African representatives was viewed as less shocking. But In 2018, with the present flux of African stars in Eupore underlines what a disastrous Mundial this has been for Africa.
The failure of five countries to qualify to the second round activate instant retrospection, in some ways, it was far more atrocious than ESPANA 1982 World Cup when Cameroon drew with inevitable champions Italy and Algeria were denied only by the then notorious West Germany v Austria “Disgrace of Gijon” game.
In Russia, three African teams – Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia – were automatically out of the competition before the third group games began, Nigeria suffered a late heartbreak against wounded Argentina and Senegal’s exit is ultimately to wind up as a World Cup trivia question for the ages.
Or on the other hand to put it all the more severe, Egypt went out without a fight; Tunisia in the same manner; Morocco played well but couldn’t score and Nigeria, same to Senegal, got choked when it mattered most.
Only three African teams have ever reached the quarter-finals of a World Cup – a Roger Milla- inspired Cameroon in 1990, Diouf -led Senegal in Korea/Japan 2002 and Ghana on African soil in 2010, who were denied reaching the semi-final stage by Asamoah Gyan awful penalty loss and a Luis Suarez handball.
The disappointment is astonishing as it comes when African teams is developing at World Cups and when fans have sat tight calmly for one team from the continent to correct their blemish on football’s biggest tournament.
With 54 countries, Africa has only a single less country than UEFA, European football’s governing body, but Europe has the lion’s offer of teams at the World Cup, 14 including host Russia.
The only World Cup light not too far off is that the number of African teams will increase from five to nine in 2026 as the competition expands from the regular 32 teams to 48..
The expanded 48-team World Cup set to be held in North America in eight years will see Africa getting nine spots, still far less than Europe’s 16 openings.
African countries used to point to the irregularity of match officials and imbalance as out of line and duly unfair for been segregated in football. But, this foul cries has been discreetly wiped out as results have failed to back calls for increased representation.
Africa’s performance in Russia 2018 World Cup so far looks far-fetched to change that circumstance.
FIFA Congress To Decide Future Host Of FIFA Women’s World Cup™
Council assigns FIFA Women’s World Cup™ hosting decision to the football governing body’s Congress; also approves financial statements for 2020 and budget for 2022.
Meeting by video conference, the Council conferred to the Congress the decision to award Women’s World Cup™ hosting rights.
Until now, the decision has been taken by the FIFA Council, most recently in June 2020 when the hosting rights for the 2023 edition were awarded to Australia and New Zealand.
As the football governing body seeks to raise the profile of the women’s game, this represents a significant step to bring the Women’s World Cup in line with the flagship men’s competition.
The proposal will be put forward for a final decision by the 71st FIFA Congress, which will meet virtually (for the second time) on 21 May.
International match calendar and release of players.
The FIFA Council received a report on the international football situation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Bureau of the Council had extended to April 2021 the temporary amendments to the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players regarding the release of players for international duty, and FIFA, the confederations, and its member associations remain in dialogue with national authorities about exemptions from quarantine rules for national team players.
READ ALSO: Mosengo-Omba Is CAF New General Secretary
The FIFA Council recognized that the highest priority in football is the health of the players, and therefore the discussion around the release of players for international duty must maintain this perspective, especially as the public health situation develops around the world.
2020 financials and 2022 budget
The Council also approved the organization’s Annual Report, which contains the financial statements for 2020 and the budget for 2022.
The FIFA Annual Report 2020 focuses on the role played by world football’s governing body in the fight against COVID-19, primarily through the unprecedented COVID-19 Relief Plan, which has made available USD 1.5 billion to support FIFA’s 211 member associations and the confederations through times of financial uncertainty.
The FIFA Annual Report 2020 is available on the official site.
FIFA Arab Cup 2021™
The Council approved the competition regulations for the FIFA Arab Cup 2021, confirming the match schedule and draw procedure for the competition taking place in Qatar from 1 to 18 December this year.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Fédération Internationale de Football Association.
Paul Onuachu: A Victim Of Tactical Deficiency
Ever wondered why Genk forward Paul Onuachu has always been a prolific figure for his club and find it hard to replicate that form with the Super Eagles when invited?
The Nigeria international has been in awesome form for the Blue-White, scoring 26 goals in the Jupiler League this season for Genk, while his scoring prowess at his club has been a contrast to his form with the national team under Gernot Rohr scoring just once in 9 games despite being a top performer at club level.
Ahead of the AFCON qualifier doubleheader against Lesotho and the Benin Republic, Super Eagles coach Gernot Rohr named his 23 man list with the inform former Midtjylland forward listed as one of the standby players.
Onuachu’s struggles with the Super Eagles in previous games he featured is quite baffling, considering the excitement that greeted his first appearance with the national team plus the impressive form he’s currently in.
The job of every manager is to find a suitable position or fashion out tactics that would be suitable for their players in other to blend with the team approaches to every match. In Onuachu’s case, he hasn’t been fortunate enough to blend in with Rohr’s tactics. While at club level, Midtjylland plays to his strength.
However, due to Napoli’s players been restricted from traveling, the Genk forward made it through the backdoor to replace Gernot Rohr’s number one forward Victor Osimhen who hasn’t really hit the ground running with the ‘Partenopei‘, but when with the Eagles, he never fails to deliver.
It’s no doubt that the lanky striker has failed to deliver in his previous games, disappointing the ever-demanding Nigerian football enthusiasts with unforgiving backlashes from the fans. However, his prolific prowess with his club suggests otherwise and consistently makes a case for him to be integrated into the team with a different tactical approach that suits his style.
The era of a target man may have been long gone in football due to the advent of new tactics that have brought about a series of changes in the game. With managers preferring to go with a fast, skillful, or makeshift winger- kind of striker, instead of a target man.
READ ALSO: Super Eagles: 9 Players Who Netted On Debut
Looking at how Paul Onuachu plays with Genk upfront shows he’s one of the best target men in football, despite been perceived by many as a slow and old-fashioned kind of forward. However, John van den Bromm has been able to carve out a tactic that suits him which has been evident with his prolific form irrespective of his style of play.
Onuachu’s Super Eagle future might be on the knife-edge with Gernot Rohr not finding the right tactics that suit the Genk forward, especially with him not been consider as the go-to man despite his blistering runs of form in Belgium.
In recent times Rohr’s philosophy of vibrant attacking football with an emphasis on passing in the final third which requires the expertise of brilliant players to implement such tactics hasn’t really favored him.
Having a player in the mold of Onuachu gives Rohr another tactical option and an alternative style of play should the initial approach fails to work as expected, but the German tactician hasn’t really taken advantage of what the man could offer with a different opponent.
Onuachu’s presence in the Super Eagles team should be an added advantage in terms of variety when the normal approach of the manager fails. With an in-form striker on the bench, it could prove valuable, but in the former Midtjylland’s case, Gernot Rohr doesn’t seem to see him as a player that has a future with the national team.
Players in the mold of the Nigerian are quite physically imposing as the point man, though they may not offer the team excellent off-the-ball movement in some cases. However, they often find a way to provide an opportunity which the team could utilize when attacking or defending.
Onuachu’s inability to show a good turn of pace and smart footwork may have been one of the deficiencies that are affecting his chances of blending perfectly into the team.
However, the job of a manager is to help players blend in perfectly, and that’s exactly what Gernot Rohr should be doing. Not only for Onuachu but for every other player who are always finding it hard to replicate club form with the National Team.